Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, BJP ministers Ashwini Vaishnaw, Prahlad Singh Patel, and political strategist Prashant Kishor were among the potential targets of surveillance through Pegasus, an Israeli spyware, reports The Wire.
The website is part of a 17-member consortium that acted as media partners to an investigation held by Paris-based non-profit organization Forbidden Stories and rights group Amnesty International into a leaked list of over 50,000 phone numbers across the world that are believed to have been the target of surveillance through Pegasus.
On Sunday, the international media consortium reported that more than 300 verified mobile phone numbers, including of two serving ministers, 40 journalists, three opposition leaders, and one sitting judge besides scores of business persons and activists in India were possibly targeted for hacking through the Israeli spyware sold only to government agencies. The government, however, dismissed allegations of any kind of surveillance on its part on specific people, saying the report “has no concrete basis or truth associated with it whatsoever.”
Pegasus is sold by the Israeli company NSO Group, which says it only offers its spyware to ‘vetted governments.’ Pegasus was in the news in 2019 when it was found that spies used the spyware to hack into phones of roughly 1,400 users around the world, including 121 Indians.
The Congress said the government was ‘listening to bedroom conversations’ and mocked the ruling BJP as ‘Bharatiya Jasoos (spy) Party’__.
The Wire reported that amid the West Bengal assembly elections held recently, Prashant Kishor’s phone was hacked using Pegasus. The mobile number of Trinamool Congress MP Abhishek Banerjee, nephew of West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee was also a potential target for surveillance by a government client of NSO Group. Banerjee’s personal secretary also figures on the list.
At least two mobile phone accounts used by Rahul Gandhi were also listed as potential targets. Five of his social friends and acquaintances’ phone numbers were also added to the list of targets, none of whom are involved in politics or public affairs.
The phone numbers of Ashwini Vaishnaw, who was recently appointed the Minister of Communications, Electronics, and Information Technology, and Prahlad Singh Patel, Minister of State for Jal Shakti, were also among the verified Indian numbers listed as potential targets for surveillance during 2017-2019.
IT minister Vaishnaw, however, said in the Lok Sabha on Monday, the first day of the monsoon session, that a highly sensational story was published on Sunday night. He said many over-the-top allegations had been made around this story. “Hon’ble Speaker Sir, the press reports have appeared a day before the Monsoon session of Parliament. This cannot be a coincidence,” he said in the House. Vaishnaw pointed out that in the past, ‘similar claims’ were made regarding the use of Pegasus on WhatsApp and that those reports had no factual basis.
He stressed on the point that the presence of a phone number in the data does not reveal whether a device was infected with Pegasus or subject to an attempted hack. Therefore, the report itself clarifies that presence of a number does not amount to snooping.
He also pointed NSO’s reaction .“NSO Group believes that claims that you have been provided with, are based on misleading interpretation of leaked data from basic information, such as HLR Lookup services, which have no bearing on the list of the customers’ targets of Pegasus or any other NSO products,” he said.
Vaishnaw said that NSO has also said that the list of countries shown using Pegasus is incorrect and many countries mentioned are not even our clients. It also said that most of its clients are western countries”.
“In India, there is a well-established procedure through which lawful interception of electronic communication is carried out for the purpose of national security, particularly on the occurrence of any public emergency or in the interest of public safety, by agencies at the Centre and States,” Vishnaw said, adding there was no ‘substance behind the sensationalism.